We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Post your ideas
Start by posting ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The offering manager team will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Receive notifications on the decision
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
Please use the following workspace to raise ideas for these offerings for all environments (traditional on-premises, containers, cloud):
Cloud Pak for Multicloud Management
Cloud Pak for Network Automation - incl Orchestration and Performance Management
Cloud Pak for Watson AIOps - incl Netcool Operations Management portfolio
Edge Application Manager
IBM Observability with Instana
ITM-APM Products - incl IBM Tivoli Monitoring v6 and Application Performance Monitoring v8
Dynamic Y-axis and threshold line for Resource DetailedReport
This problem is actual for the Customer because it is not comfortable to work with report when metric values are less than 10%, and threshold is 80%. Everything is very small on such graph. Besides threshold value is useless on graph if metric v...
CommonPack Models (Application Studio): Changing BH_VALUE field name in the SBH Definition area to the counter name
The new structure of Common Pack models (CP) introduced with TNPMW v1.4.1 changed the whole logic of the busy hours (BH).It was discovered that the so called BH determiner does not come from the same source tables as it was in the old method, but ...
Request to change old data purge logic to remove dbf files using DB drop tablespace statement
To correctly conduct disk space management on standby database customer needs to change the way the purge script remove dbf files.Now it uses OS rm command and they need that dbf files get deleted usingsql statement DROP TABLESPACE with option "IN...
Ability to view BOTH in and out traffic on same graph
The current netflow graph requires the user to select either inbound or outbound traffic. It would be more useful to be able to view both in and out bound traffic in a single view for an interface rather than requiring the user to select one and ...
Looking for capability to generate report via scheduler on NPI on NetFlow, QoS and SNMP monitoring. Currently there is no way to auto generate report on scheduler and send it to multiple recipient on regular basis.
Looking for capability to report QoS on specific device also group of devices on some QoS KPI like drop queue, discard queue and network utilization on qos policy.Capability to generate PDF report and schedule it on regular basis. E.g. in our case...
Use GetBulk instead of GET & GETnext for getting traps from device in TNPM
using GET method sending traps for MIBs is possibly causing Device performance issue. They are being measured massively from the devices with GET operation and not BULK operation. count of packets using GET operation GET 969637206